Mrs. Jordan's Profession, Claire Tomalin
Excavating remarkable women from
the margins of history is a noble goal. Too often, the former fairer sex
existed, if at all, exclusively as an addendum to their father and/or husband. She
held value as a tribute to a man, both as his helpmate and adornment. However,
while the tale of Mrs. Jordan is enjoyable, she is perhaps not the feminist heroine ClaireTomalin works so tirelessly to anoint in Mrs. Jordan’s Profession.
Mrs. Jordan, nee Dorthea Bland
(1761-1816), is know for her long career in the English theater as well as for
her extensive production of illegitimate children on behalf of the future King William
IV. Tomalin has an impressive grasp of the subject and provides interesting
descriptions of the lifestyle of the period’s transient acting companies, both
socially and economically. The era’s
otherness is aptly summarized without sentimentality in crisp sentences such
as, when describing the protagonist’s son, “Henry reappeared at last in July
too, after fourteen months in the Baltic, a hardened twelve-year-old.” Stylistically, there are sprinklings of wit,
but mostly chunky paragraphs which are easily read but less easily loved.
As Mrs. Jordan’s pretense of
domestic bliss with the William breaks down when the deficiency of his older
brothers’ fertility necessitated a shift in domestic alliance the story loses its
charm. Cast out of her fancy estate by her erstwhile partner, this faded star
dies in poverty in France, hiding from debts purportedly accumulated by others
in in her name. Here Tomalin swerves a bit from impartial recorder of facts and
devotes the last part of the tome attempting to shield Mrs. Jordan from harsh judgement.
Tomalin rages against said treatment, calling Mrs. Jordan’s ex-paramour’s
behavior that of a monster. Unkind? Yes. Unmodern? Yes. Unexpected? Probably
not.
Though not published until 1813, Pride
and Prejudice was written during the years Mrs. Jordan was undertaking her
brood building with a Royal lover. British society, as Austen’s fiction makes
clear, had strict standards for women during that time, and the threat of ostracism
as a remedy to undesirable behavior was
ever present. Mrs. Jordan flouted gender expectations in favor of financial
rewards. The fact she was on occasion treated
cruelly by society and then significantly trimmed from the official records of
his majesty is regrettable but hardly shocking.
Tomalin is more successful as a
purveyor of history than as Mrs. Jordan’s posthumous public relations
representative. I still recommend this narrative as a fun read, but with a
cautionary, more to biographers than readers. It makes sense to write about individuals
one respects, but as this author demonstrates, the slide from serious academic
to mawkish cheerleader is never makes for a good book.
Comments
Post a Comment